

Plus, it also offers a change log that you can use to undo any changes or go back to the original at any time.ĭarktable offers tons of useful tools and features, making it an excellent option for working with your photos. One of the great things about Darktable in comparison with other similar tools is that it gives you a non-destructive way to work with your images. Meanwhile, on the right side of the screen, you'll find all the modules available for working with the image itself. On the left side menu, you'll find features to catalog the images, get information about them, open the color picker, or manage the masks. Once you've opened your negatives, you can go directly to the darkroom where you'll find several panels with all the available options. For example, it even lets you turn a series of photos into a time lapse, among other options. The great thing about Darktable is that it offers a complete and customizable importation system. When it comes to working with your photos, you can import them from your desktop computer or directly from the camera you work with. The program is compatible with over 400 different camera models, letting you edit your photos completely and professionally with endless features. The idea is to be able to work with your negatives and easily return to the original way in a non-destructive way. You can find the link to the binary on the forum (a great place btw., you should check it out).Darktable is an incredibly comprehensive photo processing program that lets you edit your RAW image files in a digital darkroom. Please report useful bugs in our bug tracker. We know it’s still buggy, but as a sign of goodwill and request for help in testing it we would like to ask you to give it a try.

To cut a long story short, we are extremely pleased – albeit wary – to announce a very first official pre-alpha development snapshot for 64 bit Windows. Eventually we became confident that the lack of Windows maintainership might be solved. Like some people before he managed to compile darktable on Windows and offered us the patches he had to do, but other than what we had seen before he stuck around, helped fix bugs and was open to suggestions how to solve things in a better way. Not just for the moment until all the patches got merged but for the foreseeable future. The gist of it was that the real blocker for a Windows release isn’t so much a technical one but the lack of a person (or several) dedicated to maintaining it. Then two years ago there was yet another post regarding Windows. While I still stand by what I wrote six years ago, the times they are a-changin'.

A long time ago there was a post about why we don’t have a Windows port.
